This week I received the following messages...
DISPROVING
EVOLUTION IN ONE PARAGRAPH
Hi someone sent me a book with you as the author. I'm just sharing my thoughts on human evolution with you : A human sperm and a human egg coming together forms a set of human eyes. They didn't evolve. We know exactly how they are formed. It takes nine months. This invalidates any and every article ever written on the evolution of the human eye, including this attached one by the Scientific American. Why make up an imaginary second process that exists only on paper, and can never match the known process we already have? Why make up an imaginary second process in the first place? This puts evolution on a defense it can never get off of, effectively eliminating it as an explanation for our existence, and as a serious topic to be studied. ( Why study the evolution of the human eye, when you can just study the actual process that forms them?) This applies to every other part of our body. There is exactly zero science to support human evolution. Thanks for your time.
DISPROVING EVOLUTION IN ONE PARAGRAPH PART TWO
One sperm and one egg coming together forms an entire person from head to toe. Evolution claims we evolved from a single celled organism. These two different start points, means there has to be two different processes that form a person. Only one ( sperm and egg ) is known to be real. A sperm and egg coming together forms our eyes- they didn't evolve. A sperm and egg coming together forms our lungs- they didn't evolve. A sperm and egg coming together forms our heart- it didn't evolve either. No part of our body evolved from a single celled organism. A sperm and egg comes from an already existing man and woman. There is no known process that forms a person without a sperm and egg, to explain where the already existing man and woman came from. This leaves a man and a woman standing there with no scientific explanation. We have a nine month process that shows us exactly how a person is formed. We have a known process to compare evolution to. However, since a single celled organism simply cannot do what a sperm and egg does, evolution always has and always will be relegated to a theory, second to creation. Thanks again for your time.
DISPROVING EVOLUTION IN ONE PARAGRAPH PART THREE
A human sperm and a human egg contains everything necessary to form an entire person from head to toe. A sperm and egg comes from an already existing man and woman. If evolution is the explanation for our existence, there has to be a second process that forms a person, without a sperm and egg, to explain where the already existing man and woman came from. No such process exists. This leaves a man and a woman standing there with no scientific explanation. Life as we see it reflects what is written in the Bible. There is exactly zero science to support human. Thanks again for your time, sorry if this comes on strong a little bit. This is just how I chose to word it.
The only time I’ve ever written to someone who is more of an expert than me to tell them they’re mistaken (from my place of ignorance!) was when I was very very stressed out and massively depressed and all I can guess is that I was taking it out on them.
If you don’t know how to think evolutionarily, then it can be tough to imagine how it could be true.
The fact that a person is similar but also different from their parents, siblings, and offspring is evolution. It’s happening every generation.
Evolution is the only way biology happens.
And so, since we know that rocks and fossils go back billions of years and contain a record of evolution, all we have to do is take what we know about our own families and extrapolate that constant change over deep time. That “all we have to do” was playful sarcasm. No one’s imagination can grasp deep time! But we can rationally account for its truth. We evolved from different earlier forms the same as we were made by our parents.
The bible doesn’t say evolution isn’t true.
Peace,
Holly
Hey I apreciate your response, however similar, and different looking people, does not explain where they came from in the first place. Also, nothing you said shows a second process that forms a person without a sperm and egg, to explain where the already existing man and woman came from. This process is necessary if evolution is the explanation for our existence.
No comments:
Post a Comment